Hon. Ken Agyapong has been found guilty ,He will be suspend by parliament .

Hon. ken Agyapong

Controversial Member of Parliament for Assin Central Ken Ohene Agyapong who described Ghana’s parliament as “cheap and useless,” has been found guilty for contempt, and is to be suspended by the House.


The privileges committee which investigated the matter concluded in its report that “Mr. Ken Ohene Agyapong is indeed in contempt of parliament for the remarks he made that ‘Parliament is cheap’ and ‘parliament is useless’”.
Members of the entire House will in few minutes determine whether to accept the recommendation of the privileges committee and accordingly suspend the firebrand who is currently facing another contempt charge.


‘Cheap, useless parliament’The MP in June last year while speaking on Adom FM and his own Oman FM, made the contemptuous comments against parliament and the majority leader Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu.
MP for Asawase, Alhaji Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka who filed a complaint against the MP on June 6, 2018 told parliament that he had audio and video recordings of Mr. Agyapong making remarks that put the name of parliament into disrepute.


He quoted the Assim MP as having said: “if this House were not useless, they would not have the likes of Mr Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu as its leader.”
But Mr. Agyapong denied the claims when he appeared before the privileges committee in July 2018, but after the videos were played to him, he admitted stating the House is cheap and apologised.“If Parliament feels offended, I apologise.

I apologise to Parliament; I don’t have a problem. I never said Parliament was useless. I only said Parliament was cheap (‘aye fo’). I admitted the word cheap, but not useless. I did not say that the Majority Leader was useless,” he said.
Why he ‘escaped expulsion’


The Committee explained it did not consider expulsion as a recommended sanction against the MP because he rendered apology for his remark.


“The Committee noted the apology rendered by the member and therefore did not consider as a sanction to be imposed. The Committee was however in favour of either a reprimand or a suspension.
Members of the committee consequent put the two sanctions to vote but recorded split, hence resolved to leave that to the entire House to decide the appropriate sanctions.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.